Is he gonna come out and say it?
I don’t quite understand why this is supposed to be insightful. Isn’t it obvious that Christianity, as a religion, is very much about the innate struggle between right & wrong/good & bad?
This could easily be put back on atheism:
“Take god from the drama of atheism and the plot is gone.”
I’ve recently become interested in the Chick Tract mini-comics and found this great review of The 10 Most Awesomely Insane Jack Chick Mini-Comics. My favorite quote: “It is a known fact that if you love Jesus, you are rewarded with basic depth perception.”
I actually ordered the variety pack of over 100 different mini-comis for $23! I feel a little awkward about giving my dollars to this organization, but I couldn’t help it. As they say on the website, “the cartoons grab the reader’s attention,” and they have certainly grabbed mine. I think I’ll keep a running list of all the different things I should stay away from to avoid being sent to hell.
So we all know that Francis has said some vaguely encouraging things regarding the place of women and gays in the church. The resounding tone amongst the 20 & 30 somethings I know is something like “he’s so awesome,” based on a few media-hyped statements and photographs:
- “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?”
- “Women in the church are more important than bishops and priests”
But why have so few media outlets picked up on Francis blessing the anti-gay adoption sentiments in a Christmas sermon by the Maltese Bishop Charles Scicluna, or his excommunication of Fr Greg Reynolds for supporting gay marriage and the ordination of women?
Despite acknowledging Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio’s (as he was known before assuming his role as supreme pontiff) opposition to marriage equality, The Advocate named Pope Francis their Person of the year (as did Time, and Esquire named him the Best Dressed Man of 2013, seriously).
So Francis has said some things that sound encouraging to progressives, and done some things that should piss us off. But what can we make of all this? Well, for one, we must first understand the difference between ecclesiastical law and divine law. As the head of one of the largest organizations on the planet, Francis is bound to a number of things that have come out of this 2000 year old tradition. The ordination of women and approval of gay marriage are far beyond the scope of what one pope is capable of doing. But does that mean that he needs to bless anti-gay sermons and excommunicate a priest who goes against these church teachings? Probably. Is privately approving of civil unions for gays (as a Cardinal) as radical a move as possible for somebody who wants to keep their job? Probably.
It seems like many Catholics are hearing what they want to hear and either ignoring what they don’t like or are simply not keen enough to dig a little deeper. And that is starting to produce real and lasting impacts, such as lawmakers citing Pope Francis as critical in their decision to legalize gay marriage. Perhaps many other Catholics are finally able to resolve their identities as both Catholics and supporters of gay rights or womens rights? And what does that mean for the church as a whole? A lot. If we imagine “the church” not as simply the physical structures and hierarchy, but as every single member of the congregation, we are approaching a radically different concept than the pre-Vatican II image that Benedict imposed.
The style (all of the neat things Francis has done and expressed in vague statements) is creating more of an impact on the congregation than the substance (i.e. excommunicating Fr Reynolds.). If Catholics empower themselves to not simply follow the church, and instead be the church, we might sooner find a meeting ground between those on top (the clergy) and those below (the people). So whether Francis publicly or privately approves of homosexuality or the ordination of women, the people are coming out in droves to finally speak up for the rights of some oppressed groups, and that is unquestionably good. But to think that a lot of this sentiment is based on limited information is a bit concerning.
My friend surprised me with a front row ticket to see The Book of Mormon last night! I’ve since poked around a few other theologically minded blogs to read their reviews and compare notes.
First of all, I am not really a theatre guy, but I am very much a South Park and pop-religion (or something like that?) guy. The musical was exactly what I expected (dick & fart jokes interspersed between some sort of cultural criticism) and more (seeing South Park humor portrayed by live people in the flesh was some next level entertainment).
The white, male, American saviours of poor black people
This dude takes issue with the African song with the chorus of “fuck you, god,” saying that the writers are out of touch with Ugandan culture and that they would never say such a thing. Fair enough, maybe they should have been saying “fuck you, rich, white people.” I dunno, Ugandans may not say “fuck” at all. Nonetheless, it’s just a device they use to poke fun at the gospel of prosperity, and it was funny. So why does it matter if Ugandans would never sing such a song? People don’t live their lives in song no matter where they live.
The role of mythology in religion
This was the real meat and potatoes of the story. Is the bible meant to be interpreted absolutely literally? Or do religions use stories/metaphors/parables to engage believers while pointing towards deeper truths? If you’ve read any of my other posts, you know that I’m obviously in the latter camp. This dude seems to be onboard until he confuses ends (doctrine) with means (allegory). It isn’t difficult to maintain firm beliefs about right and wrong while simultaneously viewing biblical stories as literary devices that help people understand truth. For example, one doesn’t have to believe that god literally chiseled 10 commandments on stone tablets and gave them to Moses on Mt. Sinai to believe that the 10 commandments are sacred truths. What people need are engaging stories they can relate to, not rich, white geeks telling them to conform or burn in hell.
Vocational discernment & prayer for outcomes
There ain’t a lot to say about this one, just that discernment is more about listening than asking.
I had more fun last night than I’ve had at a live performance in a very long time. During intermission I heard the woman next to me talk about how offended she was! I wanted to ask her if she had ever heard of the show before or how she ended up there.
I have been looking at Genesis/creation to see what the bible has to say about stewardship/dominion/gardening/caring for creation/etc. Tonight I figured that it might also be interesting to see what Revelation might have to say about climate change (i.e. what happens if we don’t fulfill our roles as caregivers of god’s creation). This is what I found in my initial Google search:
(This is what the website says):
Question: “How should a Christian view climate change? What does the Bible say about climate change?”
Answer: It is interesting to note how the phrase “climate change” is replacing “global warming” as the catch phrase of environmentalism. Scientists/climatologists are certain that human activity, primarily greenhouse gas emissions, is impacting the environment. What they are not certain about is precisely what the impact will be. A couple of decades ago, “global cooling” was the fear, with warnings of a new ice age being the primary scare tactic. While most scientists/climatologists today believe that global warming is the primary risk, uncertainty has led to “climate change” being used as a less specific warning. Essentially, the climate change message is this: greenhouse gas emissions are damaging the environment, and, while we are not certain what the effect will be, we know it will be bad.
Climatologists, ecologists, geologists, etc., are unanimous in recognizing that the earth has gone through significant temperature/climate changes in the past. Despite the fact that these climate changes were obviously not caused by human activity, these same scientists are convinced that human activity is the primary cause of climate change today. Why? There seem to be three primary motivations.
First, some truly and fully believe the greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change. They honestly examine the data and come to that conclusion. Second, some hold to the climate change mindset with an almost religious fervor. Many elements within the environmentalist movement are so obsessed with protecting “Mother Earth” that they will use any argument to accomplish that goal, no matter how biased and unbalanced it is. Third, some promote the climate change mentality for financial gain. Some of the strongest proponents of climate change legislation are those who stand to have the greatest financial gain from “green” laws and technologies. Before the climate change mindset is accepted, it should be recognized that not everyone who promotes climate change is doing so from an informed foundation and pure motives.
How, then, should a Christian view climate change? We should view it skeptically and critically, but at the same time honestly and respectfully. Most importantly, though, Christians should look at climate change biblically. What does the Bible say about climate change? Not much. Likely the closest biblical examples of what could be considered climate change would be the end times disasters prophesied in Revelation 6–18. Yet these prophecies have nothing to do with greenhouse gas emissions; rather, they are the result of the wrath of God, pouring out justice on an increasingly wicked world. Also, a Christian must remember that God is in control and that this world is not our home. God will one day erase this current universe (2 Peter 3:7-12) and replace it with the New Heavens and New Earth (Revelation 21–22). How much effort should be made “saving” a planet that God is eventually going to obliterate and replace with a planet so amazing and wonderful that the current earth pales in comparison?
Is there anything wrong with going green? No, of course not. Is trying to reduce your carbon footprint a good thing? Probably so. Are solar panels, wind mills, and other renewable energy sources worth pursuing? Of course. Are any of these things to be the primary focus of followers of Jesus Christ? Absolutely not! As Christians, our focus should be proclaiming the truth of the gospel, the message that has the power to save souls. Saving the planet is not within our power or responsibility. Climate change may or may not be real, and may or may not be human-caused. What we can know for certain is that God is good and sovereign, and that Planet Earth will be our habitat for as long as God desires it to be. Psalm 46:2-3, “Therefore we will not fear, though the earth give way and the mountains fall into the heart of the sea, though its waters roar and foam and the mountains quake with their surging.”
While he is not the author of every article on GotQuestions.org, for citation purposes, you may reference our CEO, S. Michael Houdmann.
Wow. We’re fucked.
Was Jesus entirely nonviolent?
I don’t think he was entirely anti-public prayer either. The point of that passage is just to point out that we need appropriate motivation for prayer. Jesus would not be opposed to praying in public should you be doing so out of an honest and loving heart. That being said, a lot of the public prayer that Christians champion would likely fall under the pompous category of prayer that Jesus was against.